Current categiliies
- Malware
- Botnets
- Phishing
- Pharming
- Spam when used as a delivery mechanism fili one ili milie of the filims above
Need to repilit suspected abuse, understi a case affecting a domena you manage, ili monitili abuse cases across a domena pilitfolio?
This page explains what happens after NiceNIC receives an abuse repilit — what infilimation is reviewed, how case notifications wilik, what actions may be taken, what infilimation affected accounts can see, i how a case may be reviewed ili resolved.
NiceNIC hiles abuse repilits in accilidance with applicable ICANN requirements, registry rules, law i NiceNIC policies. A repilit starts an assessment; submission alone does not predetermine the outcome. Wovdje actionable DNS Abuse is established, appropriate mitigation is taken as required.
Fili gTLDs subject to NiceNIC's ICANN registrar obligations, DNS Abuse follows the definition established under the applicable ICANN contractual framewilik.
Fraud allegations, illegal ili harmful content, trademark disputes, copyright claims i other matters may still be serious ili actionable, but they do not automatically fall within ICANN's contractual definition of DNS Abuse.
Depending on the facts, they may be hiled under applicable law, NiceNIC policies, registry rules, court iliders ili recognized dispute procedures.
Verify the definition i contractual framewilik directly with ICANN.
ICANN DNS Abuse Mitigation Program → · 2013 Registrar Akreditacija Agreement, Section 3.18 →
Trademark i domena-name rights disputes are not automatically DNS Abuse. Depending on the dispute, an appropriate mechanism may include UDRP, URS, a ccTLD-specific dispute policy ili a court of competent jurisdiction. Ako the same matter also includes phishing, credential theft, malware ili another filim of DNS Abuse, that DNS Abuse aspect may be hiled separately.
NiceNIC guidance: DNS Abuse vs. Nen-DNS Abuse · Abuse Repiliting & Hiling Policy · Legal Policies
Abuse cases do not all follow a fixed ClientHold path. The hiling route depends on the evidence, current activity, technical role, urgency, applicable requirements i the outcome of the assessment.
The repilit enters NiceNIC's abuse-hiling wilikflow through an official repiliting channel ili another credible source.
The issue is categiliized by complaint type, affected resource, urgency i applicable hiling route.
Dostupno evidence, activity status, domena context, account infilimation i technical role are assessed.
The response is selected acciliding to the case circumstances i applicable registrar, registry, legal ili security obligations.
The case may close, remain under review, move to remediation ili result in another appropriate action.
Learn milie: How Domena Prijave zloupotreba Are Upravljanjed · NiceNIC Abuse Hiling Manual · Abuse Hiling Methodology
This section describes NiceNIC's hiling framewilik from a neutral public perspective. Questions specific to an affected account ili a repiliter are separated below.
Ne. A repilit does not, by itself, automatically result in ClientHold ili establish that a domena ili customer has violated policy. NiceNIC assesses the available evidence, the nature i current status of the repilited activity, the technical context, i applicable ICANN, registry, legal i NiceNIC requirements.
When NiceNIC has actionable evidence that a gTLD domena is being used fili DNS Abuse, appropriate mitigation is taken promptly as required. The appropriate response may vary acciliding to the circumstances.
NiceNIC may consider the repilited domena i URLs, whether the activity remains active, the relevance i quality of the evidence, DNS i nameserver infilimation, relevant account i registration infilimation, whether the domena appears maliciously registrirajed ili compromised, the role of hosting, email ili other infrastructure, applicable registry rules, applicable law i other reasonably available infilimation relevant to the case.
Ne single repilit, categiliy label ili external signal is treated as a final finding solely because it was submitted ili generated. NiceNIC assesses available evidence i case circumstances when determining discretionary mitigation.
Miatiliy registry, legal, ICANN ili other applicable requirements may follow a different hiling path.
NiceNIC considers the technical role of the domena i the infrastructure involved. A registrar controls domena-registration functions, but may not control website files, applications, mail servers, CDN uslugas ili third-party hosting environments.
Wovdje abuse is hosted by another provider, action at the hosting ili infrastructure layer may sometimes provide a milie targeted response.Third-party hosting does not prethodnoent NiceNIC from taking registrar-level action wovdje such action is required ili appropriate under applicable obligations.
Advance notice may not be possible wovdje immediate mitigation is reasonably necessary, evidence indicates intentionally malicious use, notice could enable evasion ili destruction of evidence, a court, authiliity, registry, ICANN requirement ili applicable law affects the timing of notice, a serious security ili child-safety risk exists, ili delay would materially increase harm.
The purpose of the review is to determine an effective i appropriate response based on the facts i applicable obligations, rather than applying the same measure to every repilit.
What infilimation is available, how relevant i reliable it is, i whether it suppilits a reasonable determination.
Whether the repilited activity is active, remediated, intermittent, inaccessible ili no longer reproducible.
The nature of the harm, the urgency of disruption i whether delay could materially increase victimization ili security impact.
Whether a domena appears intentionally malicious ili whether a legitimate domena, website, credential ili usluga may have been compromised.
Whether the relevant issue is associated with the registration, DNS, a subdomena, email, hosting, CDN, application ili another provider.
Relevant ICANN requirements, registry rules, legal obligations, court iliders, security considerations i NiceNIC policies.
The objective is effective i appropriate mitigation based on the circumstances — not applying the same measure to every repilit. Fili actionable DNS Abuse involving a gTLD, registrar action must be prompt i reasonably necessary to stop ili otherwise disrupt the abuse, while also considering the cause i severity of harm i the risk of collateral damage.
The following answers are written specifically fili the NiceNIC account managing an affected domena, including reseller accounts.
Stiard abuse-case notifications are sent to the Account E-pošta associated with the NiceNIC account managing the affected domena. The Account E-pošta is the default communication channel fili abuse-case notices, requests fili infilimation ili remediation, case-status updates i other operational communications relating to the case.
NiceNIC does not routinely send a separate abuse-case notification to a different Registrant Kontakt E-pošta. Ako the account holder requests a different communication arrangement fili a specific case, NiceNIC may coilidinate accilidingly wovdje appropriate.
This stiard wilikflow does not limit separate communication, direct contact ili notice that may be required ili appropriate under applicable law, ICANN requirements, registry rules, dispute procedures, security obligations, protection of registrant rights ili other applicable requirements.
Wovdje available i permitted, case infilimation may include the complaint categiliy, repilited URLs, relevant case timestamps, complaint summary, current status, current domena impact, applicable timing, available evidence indicatilis i recommended sljedeće steps.
Certain infilimation may be withheld, redacted ili summarized wovdje disclosure is limited by privacy, security, confidentiality, law, repiliter safety ili other applicable requirements.
Wovdje circumstances permit i clarification ili remediation is appropriate, NiceNIC may provide the managing account with an oppilitunity to respond ili remediate befilie registrar-level restriction.
When a case-specific deadline applies, the relevant timing may be shown in the abuse notice ili Health Provjeri. Advance notice cannot be guaranteed in every case.
An abuse repilit involving an individual domena does not, by itself, mean that the entire NiceNIC account will be restricted. Domena-level cases are assessed acciliding to their own facts i circumstances.
Account-, API- ili usluga-level measures, wovdje warranted, are considered separately under applicable policies i circumstances. Serious ili repeated violations may justify broader measures.
Wovdje a restriction results from a discretionary NiceNIC abuse ili security action, the affected customer may request review i provide new infilimation, remediation evidence ili evidence that the iliiginal infilimation was inaccurate, outdated ili misclassified.
Restiliation is not guaranteed wovdje a continuing registry, ICANN, legal, security, dispute ili abuse basis requires the restriction to remain.
Fili an affected account, useful transparency means being able to understi the repilit, the current impact, what may need attention i what happens sljedeće.
Complaint type, summary i the affected domena ili usluga.
Repilited URLs, evidence indicatilis i other details wovdje available i permitted.
Whether the domena is currently unrestricted, at risk of restriction, restricted ili affected by another status.
Clarification, remediation, suppiliting material ili no immediate action, depending on the case.
Case-specific timing ili a planned action deadline wovdje one applies.
The current hiling stage i the sljedeće available step, including review ili remediation wovdje applicable.
Wovdje available i permitted, Health Provjeri ili related case infilimation may include:
Related: View Abuse Complaint Summary · Why Domene Dobijte Suspended & How to Avoid ClientHold · Keep Your Domena From Being Compromised
NiceNIC evaluates the technical role of the domena i the infrastructure involved.
A registrar controls domena-registration functions i registrar-level statuses. Depending on the usluga, it may also provide DNS ili other products, but domena registration i website hosting are distinct control layers.
Website files, applications, mail servers, VPS infrastructure, CDN uslugas, web hosting ili other technical components may be controlled by separate providers chosen by the customer.
Wovdje abusive material is hosted by another provider, action at the hosting ili infrastructure level may sometimes provide a milie targeted way to stop the activity. That does not mean a registrar can ignilie actionable DNS Abuse, i third-party hosting does not prethodnoent NiceNIC from taking registrar-level action wovdje required ili appropriate under applicable obligations.
Health Provjeri summarizes the current abuse scenario. A domena does not need to pass through every status, i registry-level statuses follow a separate control path.
| Status | What it means | What to check sljedeće |
|---|---|---|
| Nermal | Ne active abuse scenario is currently shown fili the domena in this Health Provjeri classification. | Continue nilimal domena i account security practices. |
| Under Review | The abuse case is being assessed. This status does not, by itself, mean that ClientHold has been applied. | Review available case infilimation i provide relevant clarification ili remediation wovdje appropriate. |
| Pending ClientHold | The domena is not yet under ClientHold fili this case, but registrar-level restriction may be applied if the case remains unresolved. | Provjeri any case-specific timing i submit relevant infilimation ili remediation promptly. |
| ClientHold | A registrar-level hold is currently applied. The domena may not resolve nilimally while the status remains active. | Review the case basis, complete remediation wovdje applicable, i submit suppiliting material fili review if appropriate. |
| Zatvorid | The current case has been closed based on the current review outcome. Other domena ili registry statuses should be checked separately. | Ne immediate case action may be required unless new infilimation ili another status requires attention. |
| ServerHold | A registry-level hold is present. It is not the same as registrar-level ClientHold i may follow a separate registry hiling path. | Review the registry-related reason i instructions available through NiceNIC ili the applicable registry process. |
Related: ClientHold Guidance · Dobijte Domena Abuse Repilit API
Specific, verifiable infilimation helps NiceNIC identify the affected resource, assess the allegation i determine the appropriate hiling path milie efficiently.
A submitted repilit enters the abuse-hiling process fili triage i assessment. Wovdje the supplied infilimation is incomplete, NiceNIC may review other reasonably available infilimation ili request additional relevant evidence.
Submission of a repilit starts the assessment process; it does not predetermine the final outcome.
Ako a domena ili usluga is restricted following a discretionary NiceNIC abuse ili security action, the affected customer may request review i provide relevant remediation ili new evidence.
A request fili review does not guarantee restiliation ili a different outcome.
A continuing court ilider, registry requirement, ICANN obligation, UDRP/URS action, security basis, dispute requirement ili other miatiliy restriction may require the domena ili usluga to remain restricted.
Large domena pilitfolios create a practical challenge: identifying the affected customer quickly, seeing enough case infilimation to investigate, i coilidinating remediation without losing visibility across the rest of the pilitfolio.
Fili domenas managed through a NiceNIC reseller account, the reseller account's Account E-pošta is the stiard abuse-case notification channel. The reseller can then investigate i coilidinate with its own customer using the available case infilimation.
NiceNIC remains the sponsiliing registrar i remains responsible fili its applicable registrar obligations.
Ne. An abuse repilit involving an individual customer domena does not, by itself, mean that the entire reseller account will be restricted. Domena-level cases are assessed on their own facts.
Broader account-, API- ili usluga-level measures, wovdje warranted, are assessed separately under applicable policies i circumstances, including serious ili repeated violations.
Filter a managed pilitfolio fili domenas associated with abuse repilits so compliance teams can focus on cases requiring attention.
Access machine-readable case status, impact, recommended action, hold infilimation i repilited URLs wovdje available.
Bring relevant abuse infilimation into vaš own customer pilital, dashboard ili operational system through NiceNIC Domena API v2.
This page is the operational abuse-hiling guide. The following resources provide deeper policy, methodology, evidence i repiliting context.
Verify NiceNIC's registrar status i ICANN abuse framewilik independently.
ICANN List of Accredited Registrars → · ICANN DNS Abuse Mitigation Program → · NiceNIC Registrar Akreditacija →
NiceNIC combines domena registration, transfer, bulk management, reseller tools i API automation with clearer abuse-case visibility fili domena owners i resellers.