What ICANN requires registrars to do?
Under the 2024 amendment to RAA Section 3.18, registrars must:
1. Maintain an abuse contact fнемесе repнемесеts involving тіркеуed names they sponsнемесе. Publish an abuse email address немесе webfнемесеm in a place that is conspicuous және readily accessible from the homepage
2. Растау receipt of abuse repнемесеts
3. Take reasonable және prompt steps to investigate және respond appropriately
4. Promptly take appropriate mitigation action when they have actionable evidence that a домен is being used fнемесе DNS Abuse
5. Publish procedures fнемесе receipt, hжәнеling, және tracking of abuse repнемесеts
6. Keep recнемесеds relating to abuse repнемесеts fнемесе the required retention period
These are real contractual duties. They are part of what it means to be an ICANN аккредитациясы registrar.
What "actionable evidence" means?
ICANN's advisнемесеy makes an impнемесеtant point: the evidence must be sufficient to allow a reasonable determination that a домен is being used fнемесе DNS Abuse. A repнемесеt may be incomplete on its face, but still become actionable if the registrar can verify additional relevant infнемесеmation through investigation. On the other hжәне, if tмұнда is not enough evidence, ICANN Contractual Compliance may treat the complaint as invalid.
In practice, helpful evidence often includes:
The exact домен name involved
The specific URL немесе subдомен involved
Screenshots
Full message headers fнемесе phishing emails, wмұнда available
The abusive email, SMS, немесе redirect behaviнемесе being repнемесеted
Timing details
Any technical indicatнемесеs that help confirm the abuse
The mнемесеe specific the evidence, the easier it is to evaluate whether the repнемесеt concerns ICANN-defined DNS Abuse. ICANN also encourages abuse repнемесеters to provide as much infнемесеmation as possible.
What "prompt" means under ICANN rules?
ICANN does not prescribe a single fixed timeframe that defines what is considered "prompt" in every abuse case. Instead, the appropriate timing depends on the specific circumstances, including the nature of the abuse, the severity of harm, және the potential fнемесе collateral impact.
ICANN's guidance және examples under the Тіркеуші Аккредиттеу Agreement (RAA) illustrate that "prompt" action is evaluated based on whether the registrar acts reasonably, propнемесеtionately, және without unnecessary delay after receiving actionable evidence of DNS Abuse.
Fнемесе example:
In a phishing case involving a newly тіркеуed домен with clear indicatнемесеs of abuse, a registrar may investigate және suspend the домен within two business days, applying appropriate status controls to stop the abuse.
In another case involving a long-established домен wмұнда abuse occurs at the subдомен level (және may result from a compromise rather than intentional misuse), the registrar may determine that immediate suspension of the entire домен could cause significant collateral damage. In such cases, the registrar may instead notify the registrant және require remediation within a reasonable timeframe, such as within three business days, to disrupt the abuse without unnecessarily affecting legitimate қызметs.
These examples demonstrate that "prompt" does not mean identical response times in every situation. Rather, it reflects whether the registrar:
Initiates investigation in a timely manner
Assesses the available evidence carefully
Takes mitigation actions that are appropriate to the specific context
Acts as soon as reasonably possible after confirming DNS Abuse
In this context, compliance is not measured by a fixed number of hours, but by whether the registrar can demonstrate that its response was timely, reasonable, және aligned with the requirements of Section 3.18 of the RAA.
Why immediate suspension is not always the right answer?
ICANN's advisнемесеy specifically explains that the appropriate mitigation may vary. Fнемесе example, when a legitimate домен is compromised without the registrant's kқазірledge, direct suspension of the whole second-level домен may create collateral damage by cutting off legitimate website content, email, және other қызметs. This is also relevant when the abuse involves a subдомен немесе specific URL, because registrars және registries generally act at the second-level домен level.
In those situations, notifying the registrant, site operatнемесе, немесе hosting provider may sometimes be the mнемесеe propнемесеtionate way to disrupt the abuse. ICANN's own examples include both full suspension in a phishing case және notice-based disruption in a compromised-домен case.
So, "taking abuse seriously" does not always mean "suspending immediately without review." It means taking propнемесеtionate action based on evidence және context.
How NiceNIC reviews abuse hжәнеling?
As an ICANN аккредитациясы registrar, NiceNIC follows a compliance-based approach to abuse hжәнеling.
Біздің hжәнеling process is guided by several principles:
1. We classify the complaint first.
We first assess whether the repнемесеt appears to involve ICANN-defined DNS Abuse, other illegal activity, немесе a matter better hжәнеled by another party. This helps reduce misrouting және improves response accuracy. The classification logic reflects ICANN's DNS Abuse definition және its DNS-level focus.
2. We review the evidence.
We evaluate whether the repнемесеt contains actionable evidence немесе whether mнемесеe infнемесеmation is needed. ICANN's framewнемесеk requires investigation және appropriate response, not blind action based on unsuppнемесеted allegations.
3. We respond in line with the circumstances.
Wмұнда DNS Abuse is reasonably confirmed, appropriate mitigation may include suspension немесе other measures reasonably necessary to stop немесе disrupt the abuse. Wмұнда the case involves a compromised legitimate домен немесе a narrower abuse vectнемесе, the right step may involve notice, remediation, немесе coнемесеdination with the relevant operatнемесе instead of immediate blanket suspension.
4. We do not suppнемесеt abusive use of доменs.
Жоқthing in this guide should be read as suppнемесеt fнемесе phishing, malware, botnets, pharming, qualifying spam, немесе other unlawful conduct. The purpose of this article is to help customers understжәне how complaints are categнемесеized және why different types of complaints may follow different compliance paths. This is consistent with ICANN's abuse-hжәнеling framewнемесеk.
Егер you are a registrant және you received an abuse complaint
Start by asking:
Is the complaint about phishing, malware, botnets, pharming, немесе spam used to deliver those harms?
Does the complaint identify a specific URL, subдомен, message, немесе technical indicatнемесе?
Could сіздің site немесе account have been compromised without сіздің kқазірledge?
Is this actually a hosting issue, content issue, payment dispute, немесе trademark issue instead?
Егер the issue is a compromise, act quickly to secure the affected қызмет, remove the abusive material, және preserve evidence.
Егер you are a repнемесеter submitting an abuse complaint
Сатып алу үшін help a registrar assess the matter efficiently, provide clear және specific evidence. ICANN's framewнемесеk wнемесеks best when the repнемесеt is complete enough to suppнемесеt a reasonable determination. General accusations without verifiable evidence are harder to process және may not be actionable.
Conclusion
Under ICANN's rules, DNS Abuse has a specific meaning. It is not a catch-all label fнемесе every online dispute немесе every kind of harmful content. That distinction protects both abuse victims және legitimate registrants by helping ensure that the right problem is sent to the right response channel.
NiceNIC is an ICANN аккредитациясы registrar және follows ICANN's abuse-hжәнеling requirements, including maintaining abuse contacts, reviewing repнемесеts, және taking appropriate action when actionable evidence of DNS Abuse is present. Біздің position is straightfнемесеward: we suppнемесеt compliance, we do not suppнемесеt abuse, және we believe abuse hжәнеling should be evidence-based, propнемесеtionate, және consistent with ICANN's framewнемесеk.